Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

13 questions · 13 findings · 5 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 8 · 61.5%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 23.1%Low 2 · 15.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Traction vs another type of traction

Adverse effects · people with low‐back pain with and without sciatica

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Traction for low‐back pain with or without sciatica 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Traction vs any other treatment

Adverse effects · people with low‐back pain with and without sciatica

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Traction for low‐back pain with or without sciatica 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Traction vs Placebo or no active treatment

Adverse effects · people with low‐back pain with and without sciatica

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Traction for low‐back pain with or without sciatica 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Physiotherapy with traction vs physiotherapy without traction

Adverse effects · people with low‐back pain with and without sciatica

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Traction for low‐back pain with or without sciatica 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Virtual reality distraction vs non‐VR distraction

Adverse effects (related to engagement with VR) · children (0 to 18 years)

1 finding from 1 review

Virtual reality distraction for acute pain in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 429 participants
Very low

Virtual reality distraction vs other VR distraction

Adverse effects (related to engagement with VR) · children (0‐18 years)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Virtual reality distraction for acute pain in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Virtual reality distraction vs no distraction

Adverse effects (related to engagement with VR) · children (0 to 18 years)

1 finding from 1 review

Virtual reality distraction for acute pain in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 154 participants
Very low

Penile traction therapy vs no treatment (short‐term)

Treatment‐related adverse effects · men with Peyronie's disease (diagnosis of disease: varying, penile curvature: at least 30 degrees)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐surgical therapies for Peyronie's disease 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 90 participants
Very low

Phacoemulsification vs laser peripheral iridotomy

Adverse effects · Participants with acute primary angle closure after initial medical treatment to lower intraocular pressure

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction versus laser peripheral iridotomy for acute primary angle closure 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 99 participants
Low

Phacoemulsification vs laser peripheral iridotomy

Adverse effects · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification plus goniosynechialysis

Adverse effects (at 6 months) · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification plus viscogonioplasty

Adverse effects (at 12 months) · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification plus trabeculectomy

Adverse effects (up to 12 months) · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma

Phacoemulsification showed no clear difference in adverse effects (up to 12 months) compared with phacoemulsification plus trabeculectomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.59 [0.34, 1.04]
63 participants
Low