Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

Ignored "—": search terms need at least 3 characters.

31 questions · 31 findings · 2 reviews

No studies found 12 · 38.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 8 · 25.8%Low 10 · 32.3%Moderate 1 · 3.2%High 0 · 0%

Tracheal suction vs no tracheal suction

Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) · non‐vigorous neonates born through meconium‐stained amniotic fluid

It is very uncertain whether tracheal suction changes meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) compared with no tracheal suction (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tracheal suction vs no tracheal suction

Moderate to severe hypoxic‐ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) · non‐vigorous neonates born through meconium‐stained amniotic fluid

It is very uncertain whether tracheal suction changes moderate to severe hypoxic‐ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) compared with no tracheal suction (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tracheal suction vs no tracheal suction

Hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy · non‐vigorous neonates born through meconium‐stained amniotic fluid

It is very uncertain whether tracheal suction changes any hypoxic‐ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) compared with no tracheal suction (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tracheal suction vs no tracheal suction

Need for mechanical ventilation · non‐vigorous neonates born through meconium‐stained amniotic fluid

It is very uncertain whether tracheal suction changes need for mechanical ventilation compared with no tracheal suction (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tracheal suction vs no tracheal suction

Persistent pulmonary hypertension · non‐vigorous neonates born through meconium‐stained amniotic fluid

It is very uncertain whether tracheal suction changes persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPHN) compared with no tracheal suction (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Familiar odour (breast milk smell) vs usual care

Pain (PIPP) · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Familiar odour (breast milk smell) showed no clear difference in PIPP during endotracheal suctioning Range of scale 0 to 21. Lower… compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

Pain (PIPP) · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in PIPP during endotracheal suctioning Range of scale 0 to 21. Lower… compared with standard care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SaO 2 during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in saO 2 during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SDB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in SDB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SRB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch may leads to higher SRB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review