Activities of daily living · people with stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome measure: lower extremity function at the end of · people with stroke
2 findings from 1 review
Muscle strength · people with stroke
2 findings from 1 review
Secondary outcome measure: cognitive abilities at the end of · people with stroke
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
2 findings from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Secondary outcome measure: spatial neglect at the end of the intervention period · people with stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Dropouts, adverse events and deaths during intervention phase Numbers of dropouts, adverse events and deaths from all causes · people with stroke
tDCS showed no clear difference in secondary outcome measure: dropouts, adverse events and deaths… compared with any type of active control intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome measure: mean upper extremity function at the end of the intervention periodClinical measures of upper extremity function. Scale from: 0 to infinity. · people with stroke
1 finding from 1 review
ADL outcome · people with stroke
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
2 findings from 1 review
Secondary outcome measure: mean upper extremity function at the end of the intervention periodClinical measures of upper extremity function. Scale from: 0 to infinity. · people with stroke
2 findings from 1 review
Secondary outcome measure: lower extremity function at the end of · people with stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Muscle strength · people with stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome measure: cognitive abilities at the end of · people with stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome measure: hemispatial neglect at the end of · people with stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Dropouts, adverse events and deaths during intervention phase Numbers of dropouts, adverse events and deaths from all causes · people with stroke
tDCS showed no clear difference in secondary outcome measure: dropouts, adverse events and deaths… compared with any type of placebo or passive control intervention (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of fallers · stroke survivors
Other interventions: tDCS may leads to lower number of fallers compared with sham tDCS (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Functional communication · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Language impairment: accuracy of naming nouns at · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Language impairment: accuracy of naming verbs post intervention Accuracy in verb naming. Scale from: −infinity to +infinity · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
tDCS plus speech and language therapy (SLT) versus sham tDCS plus SLT for improving aphasia: dropouts Dropouts and adverse events · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · adults with chronic pain
It is very uncertain whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) changes pain intensity (0 to < 1 week postintervention) measured using… compared with sham (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review