Question · asked by 1 review
tDCS vs active control: Secondary outcome measure: mean upper extremity function at the end of the intervention periodClinical measures of upper extremity function. Scale from: 0 to infinity.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
tDCS vs any type of active control intervention Secondary outcome measure: mean upper extremity function to the end of · people with stroke Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 32 participants | Moderate |
tDCS vs any type of active control intervention Secondary outcome measure: mean upper extremity function at the end of the intervention periodClinical measures of upper extremity function. Scale from: 0 to infinity. · people with stroke Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 124 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.