Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Related · question page
- Titanium framework FDP vs High-gold content alloy framework FDP · 5-year prosthesis survival
  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
  5 years
  5-year prosthesis survival 84% (95% CI 0.79 to 0.89) titanium vs 98% (95% CI 0.96 to 1.00) high-gold alloy; statistically significant difference (P = 0.005)
  1 study · 47 participants
  GRADE not reported
Related · question page
- Titanium framework FDP vs High-gold content alloy framework FDP · Unacceptable restoration (poor marginal integrity / restoration removal)
  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
  RR 10.23 [1.41, 74.44]
  1 study · 47 participants
  GRADE not reported

Titanium framework FDP vs High-gold content alloy framework FDP

Unacceptable restoration (poor marginal integrity / restoration removal) · Partially edentulous patients receiving tooth-supported FDPs

Titanium framework FDP led to higher unacceptable restoration (poor marginal integrity / restoration… compared with high-gold content alloy framework FDP; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 10.23 [1.41, 74.44]
1 study · 47 participants
GRADE not reported

Titanium framework FDP vs High-gold content alloy framework FDP

5-year prosthesis survival · Partially edentulous patients receiving tooth-supported FDPs

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
5 years
5-year prosthesis survival 84% (95% CI 0.79 to 0.89) titanium vs 98% (95% CI 0.96 to 1.00) high-gold alloy; statistically significant difference (P = 0.005)
1 study · 47 participants
GRADE not reported