Question · asked by 1 review
Titanium framework FDP vs High-gold content alloy framework FDP: 5-year prosthesis survival
- Population
- Partially edentulous patients receiving tooth-supported FDPs
- Intervention
- Titanium framework FDP
- Comparison
- High-gold content alloy framework FDP
- Outcome
- 5-year prosthesis survival
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Titanium framework FDP vs High-gold content alloy framework FDP 5-year prosthesis survival · Partially edentulous patients receiving tooth-supported FDPs · 5 years Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | 5-year prosthesis survival 84% (95% CI 0.79 to 0.89) titanium vs 98% (95% CI 0.96 to 1.00) high-gold alloy; statistically significant difference (P = 0.005) | 1 study · 47 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2011-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.