evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 4 · 57.1%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 28.6%Low 1 · 14.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)

Serious adverse events measured by surgery or procedure‐related complications within 30 days ‐ not reported · patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)

Major bleeding · patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures

It is very uncertain whether thromboelastography threshold changes major bleeding within 24 hours № of participants: 60 (1 RCT) compared with standard of care (laboratory parameters) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)

Number of individuals requiring a transfusion within 7 days № of participants: 60 (1 RCT) · patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures

Thromboelastography threshold may leads to lower number of individuals requiring a transfusion within 7 days № of… compared with standard of care (laboratory parameters) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography threshold vs standard of care (laboratory parameters)

Serious adverse events measured by plasma transfusion‐related complications within 24 hours № of participants: 21 (1 RCT) · patients undergoing non‐cardiac surgery/invasive procedures

It is very uncertain whether thromboelastography threshold changes serious adverse events measured by plasma transfusion‐related… compared with standard of care (laboratory parameters) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review