Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

26 questions · 26 findings · 4 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3 · 11.5%GRADE not reported 10 · 38.5%Very low 13 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Automated telemedicine monitoring vs conventional

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy · women with pre‐existing diabetes

1 finding from 1 review

Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Automated telemedicine monitoring vs conventional

Caesarean section · women with pre‐existing diabetes

It is very uncertain whether automated telemedicine monitoring changes caesarean section compared with conventional (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.96 [0.62, 1.48]
1 study · 32 participants
Very low

Automated telemedicine monitoring vs conventional

Large‐for‐gestational age · women with pre‐existing diabetes

1 finding from 1 review

Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Automated telemedicine monitoring vs conventional

Perinatal mortality · women with pre‐existing diabetes

1 finding from 1 review

Techniques of monitoring blood glucose during pregnancy for women with pre‐existing diabetes 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported

Remote screening of the oral cavity (mobile application/telemedicine) vs Reference standard: examination and clinical evaluation by a physician/clinician with specialist knowledge or training (long-term follow-up accepted for those screened negative)

Specificity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD · Apparently healthy adults not reporting symptoms of OPMD or OSCC, attending an organised screening or surveillance programme, or screened…

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical assessment for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy… 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
Summary of findings 4 (no pooled analysis): specificity 0.99 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.00), 1.00 (95% CI 0.91 to 1.00), and 0.72 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.80) across the 3 studies. Certainty VERY LOW.
3 studies · 3600 participants
Very low

Remote screening of the oral cavity (mobile application/telemedicine) vs Reference standard: examination and clinical evaluation by a physician/clinician with specialist knowledge or training (long-term follow-up accepted for those screened negative)

Sensitivity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD · Apparently healthy adults not reporting symptoms of OPMD or OSCC, attending an organised screening or surveillance programme, or screened…

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical assessment for the detection of oral cavity cancer and potentially malignant disorders in apparently healthy… 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
Summary of findings 4 (no pooled analysis): sensitivity 0.85 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.88), 0.82 (95% CI 0.57 to 0.96), and 0.94 (95% CI 0.70 to 1.00) across the 3 studies. Prevalence 12.2% to 30.9%. Certainty VERY LOW.
3 studies · 3600 participants
Very low