Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Neonatal

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 66.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

HFNC vs low flow nasal cannula (LFNC)

Chronic lung disease · respiratory support in term infants (infants ≥ 37 weeks gestational age to the end of the neonatal period (up to 1 month postnatal age))

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in term infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

HFNC vs low flow nasal cannula (LFNC)

Duration of any form of respiratory support (any form of non‐invasive respiratory support with or without supplemental oxygen) · respiratory support in term infants (infants ≥ 37 weeks gestational age to the end of the neonatal period (up to 1 month postnatal age))

1 finding from 1 review

High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in term infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 74 participants
Very low

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

1 finding from 1 review

High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in term infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 530 participants
Very low