Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings: SLT vs no SLT (immediate outcome)

Receptive language: auditory comprehension · adults with aphasia following stroke

Summary of findings: SLT showed no clear difference in receptive language: auditory comprehension compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
SMD 0.06
9 studies · 399 participants
Low

Summary of findings: SLT vs no SLT (follow‐up at 6 months)

Receptive language: auditory comprehension · adults with aphasia following stroke

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: SLT changes receptive language: auditory comprehension (6 months compared with no SLT (follow‐up at 6 months) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 1.38
2 studies · 111 participants
Very low