Summary of findings: SLT A vs SLT B
Summary of findings: SLT A may leads to higher functional communication compared with SLT B (low certainty).
- MD 11.75 [4.09, 19.4]2 studies · 84 participantsLow
Summary of findings: SLT A may leads to higher functional communication compared with SLT B (low certainty).
Summary of findings: SLT A probably leads to higher severity of impairment compared with SLT B (moderate certainty).
Summary of findings: SLT probably leads to higher functional communication compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: SLT changes expressive language: naming (6 months compared with no SLT (follow‐up at 6 months) (very low certainty).
Summary of findings: SLT showed no clear difference in number of dropouts (for any reason) compared with no SLT (follow‐up at 6 months) (moderate certainty).
Summary of findings: SLT showed no clear difference in receptive language: auditory comprehension compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (low certainty).
Summary of findings: SLT probably leads to higher receptive language: reading comprehension compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (moderate certainty).
Summary of findings: SLT showed no clear difference in expressive language: naming compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (low certainty).
Summary of findings: SLT may leads to higher expressive language: general compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (low certainty).
Summary of findings: SLT probably leads to higher expressive language: written compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (moderate certainty).
Summary of findings: SLT showed no clear difference in number of dropouts (for any reason) compared with no SLT (immediate outcome) (moderate certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: SLT changes functional communication (6 months compared with no SLT (follow‐up at 6 months) (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: SLT changes receptive language: auditory comprehension (6 months compared with no SLT (follow‐up at 6 months) (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: SLT changes expressive language: naming compared with social support and stimulation (very low certainty).
Summary of findings: SLT may leads to lower number of dropouts for any reason compared with social support and stimulation (low certainty).