IUI in a stimulated cycle vs TI
OHSS per couple · couples with male subfertility
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedLow
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
31 questions · 38 findings · 3 reviews
No studies found 7 · 18.4%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 10 · 26.3%Low 18 · 47.4%Moderate 3 · 7.9%High 0 · 0%
IUI in a stimulated cycle vs TI
Multiple pregnancy rate · couples with male subfertility
IUI in stimulated cycles showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy rate per couple compared with TI (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 3.15 [0.12, 79.69]Studies not reportedLow
IUI in a stimulated cycle vs TI
Miscarriage · couples with male subfertility
IUI in stimulated cycles showed no clear difference in miscarriage rate per couple compared with TI (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 1.03 [0.19, 5.42]Studies not reportedLow
IUI in a stimulated cycle vs TI or expectant management
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome rate per woman ‐ not reported · participants with unexplained subfertility
It is very uncertain whether IUI in a stimulated cycle changes ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome rate per woman compared with TI or expectant management (very low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- OR 2.75 [0.11, 69.83]1 study · 68 participantsVery low
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
IUI in a stimulated cycle vs TI or expectant management
Miscarriage · participants with unexplained subfertility
IUI in a stimulated cycle showed no clear difference in miscarriage rate per couple compared with TI or expectant management (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- OR 1.66 [0.56, 4.88]2 studies · 208 participantsLow
- OR 2.87 [1.18, 7.01]2 studies · 454 participantsModerate
IUI in a stimulated cycle vs TI or expectant management
Ectopic pregnancy rate per couple · participants with unexplained subfertility
IUI in a stimulated cycle showed no clear difference in ectopic pregnancy rate per couple compared with TI or expectant management (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- OR 3.06 [0.12, 76.95]1 study · 100 participantsLow
- OR 9.28 [0.49, 174.6]1 study · 201 participantsLow
IUI in a stimulated cycle vs TI or expectant management
Multiple pregnancy rate · participants with unexplained subfertility
IUI in a stimulated cycle showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy rate per couple compared with TI or expectant management (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
- OR 3.01 [0.47, 19.28]2 studies · 454 participantsLow
- OR 1.46 [0.55, 3.87]4 studies · 316 participantsLow
IUI in a stimulated cycle vs IUI
Multiple pregnancy rate · participants with unexplained subfertility
IUI in a stimulated cycle showed no clear difference in multiple pregnancy rate per couple compared with IUI (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 3 [0.11, 78.27]1 study · 39 participantsLow
IUI in a stimulated cycle vs IUI
Ovarian Hyperstimulation rate per woman ‐ not measured · participants with unexplained subfertility
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
IUI in a stimulated cycle vs IUI
Miscarriage · participants with unexplained subfertility
IUI in a stimulated cycle showed no clear difference in miscarriage rate per couple compared with IUI (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 5.21 [0.19, 141.08]1 study · 26 participantsLow
IUI in a stimulated cycle vs IUI
Ectopic pregnancy rate per couple · participants with unexplained subfertility
It is very uncertain whether IUI in a stimulated cycle changes ectopic pregnancy rate per couple compared with IUI (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- OR 6.48 [0.33, 127.09]1 study · 211 participantsVery low