Selective or stepwise carious tissue removal vs Non-selective or complete carious tissue removal
Proportion of dentists selecting selective or stepwise removal · Dentists surveyed about deep carious lesions in permanent teeth
In Oen 2007, 18% of surveyed dentists selected selective or stepwise removal.
12 findings from 1 review
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesMultiple countries · Oen 2007Proportion (%) 18 [11, 27]1 study · 85 participantsGRADE not reported
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesBrazil · Weber 2013Proportion (%) 21 [12, 34]1 study · 53 participantsGRADE not reported
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesBrazil · Chisini 2015Proportion (%) 62 [55, 69]1 study · 171 participantsGRADE not reported
Show 9 more findings
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesUnited States · Seale and Glickman 2007 (pedodontists)Proportion (%) 71 [65, 77]1 study · 252 participantsGRADE not reported
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesNorway · Schwendicke 2016 (Norway)Proportion (%) 99 [95, 100]1 study · 199 participantsGRADE not reported
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesUnited States · Seale and Glickman 2007 (all 376 conference dentists; source mislabels as 'endodontists', but only 102 were endodontists)Proportion (%) 59 [54, 64]1 study · 376 participantsGRADE not reported
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesNorway · Stangvaltaite 2013Proportion (%) 51 [44, 58]1 study · 212 participantsGRADE not reported
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesGermany · Schwendicke 2016 (Germany)Proportion (%) 68 [64, 71]1 study · 622 participantsGRADE not reported
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesGermany · Schwendicke 2013Proportion (%) 50 [47, 53]1 study · 799 participantsGRADE not reported
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesUnited States · McBride 2010Proportion (%) 35 [32, 38]1 study · 812 participantsGRADE not reported
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesBrazil · Katz 2013Proportion (%) 45 [26, 55]1 study · 108 participantsGRADE not reported
- Understanding dentists' management of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2016 All outcomesFrance · Schwendicke 2016 (France)Proportion (%) 49 [45, 52]1 study · 661 participantsGRADE not reported