Removal from exposure vs continued exposure
It is very uncertain whether removal from exposure changes absence of asthma symptoms; compared with continued exposure (very low certainty).
- RR 4.8 [1.67, 13.86]9 studies · 641 participantsVery low
It is very uncertain whether removal from exposure changes absence of asthma symptoms; compared with continued exposure (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether removal from exposure changes improvement of asthma symptoms; compared with reduction of exposure (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether removal from exposure changes being unemployed; compared with reduction of exposure (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether removal from exposure changes improvement of asthma symptoms; compared with continued exposure (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether removal from exposure changes absence of asthma symptoms; compared with reduction of exposure (very low certainty).
Restricting the lateral extent of partial pulpotomy gives success equivalent to more extensive amputation (97.6% vs 97.5%, p>0.05; ungraded, single trial).
Restricted partial pulpotomy causes less early postoperative pain and analgesic use than extended amputation (p<0.05; ungraded, single trial).