Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

43 questions · 62 findings · 6 reviews · Endodontics and dental trauma

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 58 · 93.5%Very low 4 · 6.5%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline) pulpotomy vs 3Mix pulpectomy

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline) pulpotomy showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with 3Mix pulpectomy; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline) pulpotomy vs 3Mix pulpectomy

Radiological failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline) pulpotomy showed no clear difference in radiological failure compared with 3Mix pulpectomy; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Tooth survival · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

Tooth survival was reported narratively in two trials and was not pooled.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Pathological periapical radiolucency · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

Two trials reported periapical radiolucency but results were not pooled owing to considerable heterogeneity.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Clinical failure · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

Pulpotomy may not differ from pulpectomy for clinical failure; no GRADE rating was reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Soft tissue pathology · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

No statistically significant difference in soft tissue pathology between pulpotomy and pulpectomy (RR 3.11, 95% CI 0.54 to 17.7; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Pathological mobility · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

Pathological mobility was rare (one tooth in one of four trials) and was not pooled.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Pathological root resorption · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

No statistically significant difference in pathological root resorption between pulpotomy and pulpectomy (RR 1.5, 95% CI 0.56 to 4.04; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Radiographic failure · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

No statistically significant difference in radiographic failure between pulpotomy and pulpectomy in the main analysis (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.42), with considerable heterogeneity (I2=76%; ungraded).

2 findings from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Pain · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

No statistically significant difference in pain between pulpotomy and pulpectomy (RR 2.06, 95% CI 0.31 to 13.8; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs Pulpectomy

Pulp canal obliteration · Children with carious vital pulp exposure in primary incisors

Pulp canal obliteration was reported narratively (mainly in the pulpotomy group) and was not pooled.

1 finding from 1 review

Full pulpotomy vs Partial pulpotomy

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Adults aged 18 years or older with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure

The three-study meta-analysis found no significant difference between full and partial pulpotomy after 1 year.

1 finding from 1 review

Full pulpotomy vs Partial pulpotomy

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Human permanent teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis due to carious pulp exposure

Full pulpotomy showed a non-significant trend toward higher success than partial pulpotomy in mature teeth with irreversible pulpitis (ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy with Biodentine vs Pulpotomy with Calcium Enriched Mixture (CEM)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Human permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis due to carious pulp exposure

Biodentine had a significantly higher pulpotomy success rate than CEM (indirect comparison; numeric estimate not available); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy with Biodentine vs Pulpotomy with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Human permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis due to carious pulp exposure

Biodentine had a significantly higher pulpotomy success rate than calcium hydroxide (indirect comparison; numeric estimate not available); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy with Biodentine vs Pulpotomy with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Human permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis due to carious pulp exposure

Biodentine had a significantly higher pulpotomy success rate than MTA (indirect comparison; numeric estimate not available); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure

Hemostasis within 6 min gave the highest success (90.4%), but the difference across hemostasis-time groups was not significant (ungraded).

13 findings from 1 review
Show 10 more findings

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Human permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis due to carious pulp exposure

Among 6 observational studies, pooled pulpotomy success was 92.6 per 100 (95% CI 0.86-0.96), very low certainty.

4 findings from 1 review
Show 1 more finding

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Human permanent teeth with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis due to carious pulp exposure

In asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis, pooled pulpotomy success was 91.3% (95% CI 80-96.5%); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm pooled success proportion)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Human permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis and open (immature) root apex due to carious pulp exposure

In open-apex teeth, pooled pulpotomy success was 95.8% (95% CI 81-99%); significantly higher than closed apex (z=2.33, p=0.02); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review