Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

21 questions · 21 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 12 · 57.1%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 4.8%Low 5 · 23.8%Moderate 3 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Performance based measures ‐ Range of motion (possible range 0 (worst) to 140 (maximal) degrees) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Survival rate of the implant (Revision surgery reported) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Health related quality of life measures and functional measures with validated instruments (WOMAC, range 0‐100, higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Global assessment (patient) Patient satisfaction on scale 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Complications · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Re‐operation rate (not involving implant change, short and long term) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Performance based measures ‐ Range of motion (possible range 0 (worst) to 140 (maximal) degrees) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Knee pain Knee Society Score, sub score pain (possible range 0 (severe pain) ‐ 50 (no pain) points) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Survival rate of the implant (Revision surgery reported) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Health related quality of life measures and functional measures with validated instruments (WOMAC, range 0‐100, higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Global Assessment (Patient) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Knee pain Knee Society Score, sub score pain (possible range 0 (severe pain) ‐ 50 (no pain) points) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Complications · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Re‐operation rate (not involving implant change, short and long term) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Survival rate of the implant (Revision surgery reported) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Health related quality of life measures and functional measures with validated instruments (WOMAC, range 0‐100, higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Global assessment (patient) Patient satisfaction on scale 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Complications · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Re‐operation rate (not involving implant change, short and long term) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Performance based measures ‐ Range of motion (possible range 0 (worst) to 140 (maximal) degrees) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review