Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,809 questions · 1,956 findings · 194 reviews

No studies found 422 · 21.6%GRADE not reported 427 · 21.8%Very low 353 · 18%Low 397 · 20.3%Moderate 293 · 15%High 64 · 3.3%

Oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) vs topical ivermectin 1% lotion/solution (1 to 3 applications)

Complete clearance · people with scabies, 5 to 80 years of ageLocation: Egypt, India

Oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) showed no clear difference in complete clearance ‐ week 1 compared with topical ivermectin 1% lotion/solution (1 to 3 applications) (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) vs topical ivermectin 1% lotion/solution (1 to 3 applications)

Number of participants with ≥ 1 AE ‐ week 4 · people with scabies, 5 to 80 years of ageLocation: Egypt, India

It is very uncertain whether oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) changes number of participants with ≥ 1 AE ‐ week 4 compared with topical ivermectin 1% lotion/solution (1 to 3 applications) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) vs topical permethrin 5% cream (1 to 3 applications)

Number of participants with ≥ 1 AE ‐ week 4 · people with scabies, 2 to 80 years of ageLocation: India, Pakistan

Oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) showed no clear difference in number of participants with ≥ 1 AE ‐ week 4 compared with topical permethrin 5% cream (1 to 3 applications) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral immunosuppressants: oral cyclosporin vs topical betamethasone dipropionate

Primary: investigator‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms · people with hand eczema, continuously for 6 months, significant disability, inadequate response to conventional treatment, confirmation by…

Oral immunosuppressants: oral cyclosporin showed no clear difference in primary: investigator‐ rated good/excellent control of symptomsb compared with topical betamethasone dipropionate (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral immunosuppressants: oral cyclosporin vs topical betamethasone dipropionate

Primary: participant‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms · people with hand eczema, continuously for 6 months, significant disability, inadequate response to conventional treatment, confirmation by…

Oral immunosuppressants: oral cyclosporin showed no clear difference in primary: participant‐rated good/excellent control of symptomsb compared with topical betamethasone dipropionate (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral immunosuppressants: oral cyclosporin vs topical betamethasone dipropionate

Number of participants with any adverse event (primary tolerability outcome) · people with hand eczema, continuously for 6 months, significant disability, inadequate response to conventional treatment, confirmation by…

Oral immunosuppressants: oral cyclosporin showed no clear difference in primary: adverse events ‐ at least 1 adverse event compared with topical betamethasone dipropionate (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) vs Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO)

Stability of correction: vertical changes of pogonion (1 week to 1 year) · Adults (16 years of age or older) with an Angle Class III malocclusion (prominent lower front teeth); people with syndromes, clefts or…

Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) showed no clear difference in stability of correction: vertical changes of pogonion (1 week to 1… compared with sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) vs Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO)

Stability of correction: sagittal changes of B-point (1 week to 1 year) · Adults (16 years of age or older) with an Angle Class III malocclusion (prominent lower front teeth); people with syndromes, clefts or…

Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) showed no clear difference in stability of correction: sagittal changes of B-point (1 week to 1… compared with sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) vs Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO)

Stability of correction: sagittal changes of pogonion (1 week to 1 year) · Adults (16 years of age or older) with an Angle Class III malocclusion (prominent lower front teeth); people with syndromes, clefts or…

Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) showed no clear difference in stability of correction: sagittal changes of pogonion (1 week to 1… compared with sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) vs Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO)

Stability of correction: vertical changes of B-point (1 week to 1 year) · Adults (16 years of age or older) with an Angle Class III malocclusion (prominent lower front teeth); people with syndromes, clefts or…

Intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) showed no clear difference in stability of correction: vertical changes of B-point (1 week to 1… compared with sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review