Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs control

Visual acuity · people with traumatic hyphema

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in short‐term visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/60 at end of… compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.82 [0.67, 1]
1 study · 46 participants
Low

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs control

Final visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/50; monocular vs binocular eye patching · people with traumatic hyphema

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in final visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/50; monocular vs binocular… compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.77, 1.18]
1 study · 53 participants
Low

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs control

Risk of secondary hemorrhage; monocular versus binocular eye patching · people with traumatic hyphema

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in risk of secondary hemorrhage; monocular vs binocular eye patching compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Medical interventions for traumatic hyphema 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.77 [0.35, 1.72]
2 studies · 117 participants
Low