Manipulation (cervical) showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Intermediate‐term compared with oral medicine (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 182 participants
Moderate

Manipulation (cervical) vs oral medicine

Acute and subacute neck pain Long‐term · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

Manipulation (cervical) showed no clear difference in acute and subacute neck pain Long‐term compared with oral medicine (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 181 participants
Moderate

Manipulation (cervical) vs oral medicine

Function · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation (cervical) vs oral medicine

Participant satisfaction · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Manipulation (cervical) vs oral medicine

Quality of life · patients with acute and subacute neck pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

High dose of manipulation vs low dose of manipulation

Pain · patients with chronic neck pain with cervicogenic headache (CGH)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

High dose of manipulation vs low dose of manipulation

Chronic neck pain and CGH Intermediate‐term · patients with chronic neck pain with cervicogenic headache (CGH)

High dose of manipulation showed no clear difference in chronic neck pain and CGH Intermediate‐term compared with low dose of manipulation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 50 participants
Moderate

High dose of manipulation vs low dose of manipulation

Function · patients with chronic neck pain with cervicogenic headache (CGH)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

High dose of manipulation vs low dose of manipulation

aImprecision: ‐1. · patients with chronic neck pain with cervicogenic headache (CGH)

1 finding from 1 review

Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 participants
GRADE not reported