Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

23 questions · 23 findings · 2 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 4 · 17.4%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 11 · 47.8%Low 6 · 26.1%Moderate 2 · 8.7%High 0 · 0%

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Incidence of compromised microcirculation requiring invasive intervention (re‐exploration) (analysed by digit, · patients undergoing digital replantation after traumatic amputation

It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) changes incidence of compromised microcirculation requiring invasive… compared with no LMWH (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Incidence of compromised microcirculation requiring invasive intervention (incision) (analysed by digit, · patients undergoing digital replantation after traumatic amputation

It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) changes incidence of compromised microcirculation requiring invasive… compared with no LMWH (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Microvascular insufficiency due to vessel occlusion ‐ arterial occlusion (analysed by digit, · patients undergoing digital replantation after traumatic amputation

It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) changes microvascular insufficiency due to vessel occlusion ‐ arterial… compared with no LMWH (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Microvascular insufficiency due to vessel occlusion ‐ venous occlusion (analysed by digit, · patients undergoing digital replantation after traumatic amputation

It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) changes microvascular insufficiency due to vessel occlusion ‐ venous… compared with no LMWH (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Success rate of replantation1 (analysed by digit, · patients undergoing digital replantation after traumatic amputation

It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) changes success rate of replantation1 (analysed by digit, compared with no LMWH (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

All‐cause mortality (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic… compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Major bleeding · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes major bleeding (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Minor bleeding · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes minor bleeding (up to 3 months) compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist (VKA)

Thrombocytopenia (up to 3 months)n · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) probably leads to higher thrombocytopenia (up to 3 months)n compared with vitamin K antagonist (VKA) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) probably leads to lower symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) compared with no LMWH (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs no LMWH

Symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis (up to 3 months) · people with cancer with thrombosis prophylaxis and central venous catheters

It is very uncertain whether low‐molecular‐weight heparin (LMWH) changes symptomatic catheter‐related thrombosis measured as asymptomatic… compared with no LMWH (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review