Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1 questions · 1 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) vs photorefractive keratectomy (PRK)

Proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better post‐treatment. ‐ 12 months · patients with myopia

Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) may leads to higher UCVA of 20/20 or better compared with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Laser‐assisted in‐situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.64 [1.1, 2.45]
7 studies · 1007 participants
Low