Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

9 questions · 9 findings · 1 reviews · Hepato-Biliary

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 9 · 100%High 0 · 0%

LC + LCBDE vs LC + post‐operative ERCP

Total morbidity · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE showed no clear difference in total morbidity compared with LC + post‐operative ERCP (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.16 [0.5, 2.72]
2 studies · 166 participants
Moderate

LC + LCBDE vs LC + post‐operative ERCP

Failure of procedure · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE showed no clear difference in failure of procedure compared with LC + post‐operative ERCP (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.47 [0.21, 1.06]
2 studies · 166 participants
Moderate

LC + LCBDE vs LC + post‐operative ERCP

Retained stones after primary intervention · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE probably leads to lower retained stones after primary intervention compared with LC + post‐operative ERCP (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.28 [0.11, 0.72]
2 studies · 166 participants
Moderate

LC + LCBDE vs LC + post‐operative ERCP

Conversion to open surgery · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE showed no clear difference in conversion to open surgery compared with LC + post‐operative ERCP (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.77 [0.23, 13.81]
2 studies · 166 participants
Moderate

LC + LCBDE vs pre‐operative ERCP + LC

Mortality at 30 days · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE showed no clear difference in mortality at 30 days compared with pre‐operative ERCP + LC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.72 [0.12, 4.33]
5 studies · 580 participants
Moderate

LC + LCBDE vs pre‐operative ERCP + LC

Total morbidity · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE showed no clear difference in total morbidity compared with pre‐operative ERCP + LC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.28 [0.8, 2.05]
5 studies · 580 participants
Moderate

LC + LCBDE vs pre‐operative ERCP + LC

Failure of procedure · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE showed no clear difference in failure of procedure compared with pre‐operative ERCP + LC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.51 [0.16, 1.59]
5 studies · 580 participants
Moderate

LC + LCBDE vs pre‐operative ERCP + LC

Retained stones after primary intervention · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE showed no clear difference in retained stones after primary intervention compared with pre‐operative ERCP + LC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.79 [0.45, 1.39]
5 studies · 580 participants
Moderate

LC + LCBDE vs pre‐operative ERCP + LC

Conversion to open surgery · with common bile duct stones

LC + LCBDE showed no clear difference in conversion to open surgery compared with pre‐operative ERCP + LC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.46 [0.76, 2.81]
5 studies · 580 participants
Moderate