Mortality (all‐cause) · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination showed no clear difference in mortality (all‐cause) compared with tiotropium (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Hospital admissions · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination showed no clear difference in hospital admission (all causes) compared with tiotropium (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Exacerbations · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination showed no clear difference in exacerbation ‐ at 12‐month compared with tiotropium (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Non‐fatal serious adverse events · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (non‐fatal) compared with tiotropium (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
1 finding from 1 review
FEV1 · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
1 finding from 1 review
FEV1 pre‐dose ‐ FEV1 1 year · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1 participants
Moderate
Moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LAMA (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LAMA (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS probably leads to higher pneumonia: high‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in pneumonia: low‐risk population compared with LAMA (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS leads to lower moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LABA (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS probably leads to lower moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LABA (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS probably leads to higher pneumonia: high‐risk population compared with LABA (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pneumonia: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%
LABA/ICS leads to higher pneumonia: low‐risk population compared with LABA (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review