Reslizumab intravenous (IV) vs placebo
Reslizumab intravenous (IV) leads to lower rate of clinically significant exacerbations requiring systemic… compared with placebo (high certainty).
- Rate ratio 0.43 [0.33, 0.55]2 studies · 953 participantsHigh
Reslizumab intravenous (IV) leads to lower rate of clinically significant exacerbations requiring systemic… compared with placebo (high certainty).
Reslizumab intravenous (IV) showed no clear difference in rate of exacerbations requiring emergency department treatment or… compared with placebo (high certainty).
Reslizumab intravenous (IV) showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with placebo (high certainty).
Reslizumab intravenous (IV) showed no clear difference in clinically significant adverse events leading to discontinuation compared with placebo (high certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop… showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (from admission to discharge) compared with bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop… showed no clear difference in readmission to hospital following discharge compared with bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics (low certainty).
Summary of findings table ‐ Continuous infusion of intravenous loop… showed no clear difference in acute kidney injury (adverse event) (from admission to discharge) compared with bolus injection of intravenous loop diuretics (low certainty).
Mepolizumab intravenous (IV) leads to lower serious adverse events compared with placebo (high certainty).
Mepolizumab intravenous (IV) showed no clear difference in clinically significant adverse events leading to discontinuation compared with placebo (high certainty).
Mepolizumab intravenous (IV) leads to lower rate of clinically significant exacerbations requiring systemic… compared with placebo (high certainty).