Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

22 questions · 22 findings · 2 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 5 · 22.7%GRADE not reported 1 · 4.5%Very low 6 · 27.3%Low 7 · 31.8%Moderate 3 · 13.6%High 0 · 0%

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Clinical recovery ‐ harmful or hazardous alcohol use (1 to 6 months post intervention) · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful… showed no clear difference in clinical recovery ‐ harmful or hazardous alcohol use (1 to 6 months… compared with enhanced usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Prevalence of methamphetamine use (1 to 6 months post intervention) (RR < 1 denotes lower prevalence compared to control) · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful… showed no clear difference in prevalence of methamphetamine use (1 to 6 months post intervention)… compared with enhanced usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Clinical symptoms ‐ alcohol use (1 to 6 months post intervention) ‐ risk of hazardous or harmful alcohol use · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use
1 finding from 1 review

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Clinical symptoms ‐ alcohol and substance use (1 to 6 months post intervention) · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use
1 finding from 1 review

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Service utilisation ‐ unplanned hospitalisations (1 to 6 months post intervention) (RR < 1 denotes lower risk) · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use

It is very uncertain whether lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful… changes service utilisation ‐ unplanned hospitalisations (1 to 6 months post… compared with enhanced usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Undesirable patient health outcomes · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

It is very uncertain whether patient information interventions changes undesirable patient health outcomes (0‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient information interventions showed no clear difference in patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐12 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient information interventions may leads to higher adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Desirable patient health outcomes (3‐12 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient information interventions showed no clear difference in desirable patient health outcomes (3‐12 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient‐reported health information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐3 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

Patient‐reported health information interventions probably leads to higher adherence to recommended clinical practice (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient‐reported health information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Desirable patient health outcomes (0‐3 months · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

It is very uncertain whether patient‐reported health information interventions changes desirable patient health outcomes (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Patient‐reported health information interventions vs comparisons to improve professional performance

Patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients · general patient population, "at risk" patient population and patient population with a specific condition or disease

It is very uncertain whether patient‐reported health information interventions changes patient satisfaction Number of satisfied patients (0‐3 months compared with comparisons to improve professional performance (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review