Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

242 questions · 251 findings · 27 reviews

No studies found 44 · 17.5%GRADE not reported 3 · 1.2%Very low 69 · 27.5%Low 70 · 27.9%Moderate 52 · 20.7%High 13 · 5.2%

Interventions for vs no intervention

Number of deaths due to SUDEP: Nocturnal supervision compared to no supervision · cases of SUDEP and matched controls (number of deaths due to SUDEP) and consecutive people with epilepsy from a tertiary care teaching…
2 findings from 1 review

Interventions for vs no intervention

Number of deaths due to SUDEP: Special precautions compared to no special precautions · cases of SUDEP and matched controls (number of deaths due to SUDEP) and consecutive people with epilepsy from a tertiary care teaching…

It is very uncertain whether interventions for changes number of deaths due to SUDEP: special precautions compared to no… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral hygiene interventions (mechanical plaque removal): knowledge-based, behavioural, or skills training for people with ID or their carers vs Usual care, no care, or a similar alternative intervention

Any unintended (positive or negative) effects of the interventions · People with intellectual disabilities (ID), living at home, in day care, in hospital or in a residential care setting; all levels of ID as…
1 finding from 1 review
  • Adverse/unintended effects addressed narratively: 10 of 34 studies investigated or reported negative unintended or adverse effects (e.g. difficulty with the electric or 3-headed toothbrushes, being frightened by the…
    10 studies
    GRADE not reported

Interventions for involving patients in decision‐making about their health care vs attention control

Patient evaluation of care/the intervention Patient reports that the intervention changed management of his or her health at 6 months after baseline (3‐point scale: dichotomised into 'a great deal' vs 'somewhat' + 'not at all') (Stanford 2018) Hig... · older patients with multi‐morbidity

Interventions for involving patients in decision‐making about their… may leads to higher patient evaluation of care/the intervention Patient reports that the… compared with attention‐control conditions (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for involving patients in decision‐making about their health care vs attention control

Adverse event** Less patient involvement as a result of the intervention Not measured · older patients with multi‐morbidity

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable personality disorder vs treatment

Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · adults who engage in SH

Comparison 2: Interventions for multiple repetition of SH/probable… may leads to lower repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison 2: interventions for patients with multiple episodes of SH or emerging personality problems vs treatment

Repetition of SH at post‐intervention · children and adolescents who engage in SH.

Comparison 2: interventions for patients with multiple episodes of… showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Clinical recovery ‐ harmful or hazardous alcohol use (1 to 6 months post intervention) · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful… showed no clear difference in clinical recovery ‐ harmful or hazardous alcohol use (1 to 6 months… compared with enhanced usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Prevalence of methamphetamine use (1 to 6 months post intervention) (RR < 1 denotes lower prevalence compared to control) · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful… showed no clear difference in prevalence of methamphetamine use (1 to 6 months post intervention)… compared with enhanced usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Clinical symptoms ‐ alcohol use (1 to 6 months post intervention) ‐ risk of hazardous or harmful alcohol use · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use
1 finding from 1 review

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Clinical symptoms ‐ alcohol and substance use (1 to 6 months post intervention) · adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use
1 finding from 1 review