What do systematic reviews say?

Intervention diet vs control diet

It is very uncertain whether intervention diet changes induction of remission at 4 weeks ‐ High‐fiber, low refined… compared with control diet (very low certainty).

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 7.2 [0.53, 97.83]
  1 study · 7 participants
  Very low
• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 3.13 [0.22, 43.84]
  2 studies · 103 participants
  Very low
• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.24 [0.67, 2.29]
  1 study · 83 participants
  Very low

Intervention diet vs control diet

Intervention diet showed no clear difference in clinical relapse at 6 to 24 months ‐ Symptoms‐guided diet compared with control diet (low certainty).

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.53 [0.28, 1.01]
  2 studies · 98 participants
  Low
• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.03 [0.85, 1.26]
  1 study · 214 participants
  Low
• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.11 [0.01, 1.76]
  1 study · 54 participants
  Very low

Intervention diet vs control diet

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention diet vs control diet

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention diet vs control diet

It is very uncertain whether intervention diet changes induction of remission ‐ Symptoms‐guided diet compared with control diet (very low certainty).

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 8.25 [0.5, 136.33]
  1 study · 21 participants
  Very low

Intervention diet vs control diet

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention diet vs control diet

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention diet vs control diet

It is very uncertain whether intervention diet changes clinical relapse at 6 months ‐ Anti‐inflammatory diet (Alberta‐based) compared with control diet (very low certainty).

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.25 [0.42, 3.7]
  1 study · 28 participants
  Very low
• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.5 [0.15, 1.64]
  1 study · 15 participants
  Very low
• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.83 [0.6, 1.15]
  2 studies · 77 participants
  Low

Intervention diet vs control diet

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 12 participants
  Very low

Intervention diet vs control diet

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention diet vs control diet

It is very uncertain whether intervention diet changes induction of remission (timeframe not reported) ‐ Symptoms‐guided diet compared with control diet (very low certainty).

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 20 [1.27, 315.4]
  1 study · 51 participants
  Very low

Intervention diet vs control diet

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 51 participants
  Low

Intervention diet vs control diet

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 14 participants
  Very low

Intervention diet vs control diet

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Dietary interventions for induction and maintenance of remission in inflammatory bowel disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Individually designed, patient-centred preventive programme: dietary counselling (snacking timing, regular meals, fermentable carbohydrates) plus toothbrushing counselling, delivered by trained dental hygienists (a multi-intervention) vs Basic prevention offered as standard in public dental clinics

• One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes

  2 to 4 years
  Table 2: 52% (130) versus 53% (131) at follow-up (baseline 41% versus 44%). No significant change.
  1 study · 497 participants
  GRADE not reported

Individually designed, patient-centred preventive programme: dietary counselling (snacking timing, regular meals, fermentable carbohydrates) plus toothbrushing counselling, delivered by trained dental hygienists (a multi-intervention) vs Basic prevention offered as standard in public dental clinics

• One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes

  2 to 4 years
  Table 2: 86% (215) intervention versus 83% (205) control at follow-up (baseline 74% versus 77%). No significant change.
  1 study · 497 participants
  GRADE not reported

Individually designed, patient-centred preventive programme: dietary counselling (snacking timing, regular meals, fermentable carbohydrates) plus toothbrushing counselling, delivered by trained dental hygienists (a multi-intervention) vs Basic prevention offered as standard in public dental clinics

• One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes

  2 to 4 years
  Table 2: 77% (193) versus 75% (185) at follow-up (baseline 71% versus 69%). No significant change.
  1 study · 497 participants
  GRADE not reported

Individually designed, patient-centred preventive programme: dietary counselling (snacking timing, regular meals, fermentable carbohydrates) plus toothbrushing counselling, delivered by trained dental hygienists (a multi-intervention) vs Basic prevention offered as standard in public dental clinics

• One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes

  4 years
  Mean (95% CI) DMFS increment after 4 years: intervention 2.56 (2.07 to 3.05) versus control 4.60 (3.99 to 5.21); significant difference favouring the intervention (P<0.0001; non-overlapping CIs). No between-group point…
  1 study · 497 participants
  GRADE not reported
• One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes

  2 years
  Mean (95% CI) DMFS increment after 2 years: intervention 1.86 (1.50 to 2.21) versus control 2.44 (2.12 to 2.77); significant difference favouring the intervention (P<0.05, comparing intervention and control). No…
  1 study · 497 participants
  GRADE not reported

Individually designed, patient-centred preventive programme: dietary counselling (snacking timing, regular meals, fermentable carbohydrates) plus toothbrushing counselling, delivered by trained dental hygienists (a multi-intervention) vs Basic prevention offered as standard in public dental clinics

• One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes

  2 to 4 years
  Table 2: 71% (178) versus 68% (168) at follow-up (baseline 69% versus 65%). No significant change.
  1 study · 497 participants
  GRADE not reported

Individually designed, patient-centred preventive programme: dietary counselling (snacking timing, regular meals, fermentable carbohydrates) plus toothbrushing counselling, delivered by trained dental hygienists (a multi-intervention) vs Basic prevention offered as standard in public dental clinics

• One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes

  2 to 4 years
  Table 2: 77% (193) versus 81% (200) at follow-up (baseline 83% versus 74%, a significant baseline difference). No significant change at follow-up.
  1 study · 497 participants
  GRADE not reported