Smoking cessation · young people
Behavioural interventions showed no clear difference in individual counselling (in‐person) vs control Smoking cessation compared with minimal control (low certainty).
5 findings from 1 review
RR 1.07 [0.83, 1.39]
7 studies · 2088 participants
Low
RR 1.35 [1.03, 1.77]
9 studies · 1910 participants
Low
RR 0.79 [0.5, 1.24]
3 studies · 340 participants
Low
Show 2 more findings
Death Analysis 1.1
Interventions showed no clear difference in death Analysis 1.1 compared with control at end of intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Recurrent cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events Analysis 1.2
Interventions showed no clear difference in recurrent cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events Analysis 1.2 compared with control at end of intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events
Interventions showed no clear difference in adverse events compared with control at end of intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Sedentary time
1 finding from 1 review
Death or dependence · adults with a brain arteriovenous malformation
Interventions probably leads to higher death or dependence compared with conservative management (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage · adults with a brain arteriovenous malformation
Interventions probably leads to higher symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage compared with conservative management (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Epileptic seizure · adults with a brain arteriovenous malformation
Interventions showed no clear difference in epileptic seizure compared with conservative management (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Symptomatic radiation necrosis ‒ not reported · adults with a brain arteriovenous malformation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life ‐ not reported · adults with a brain arteriovenous malformation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Clinically important upper GI bleeding · people admitted to intensive care units
Interventions probably leads to lower clinically important upper GI bleeding compared with placebo or no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Nosocomial pneumonia · people admitted to intensive care units
Interventions showed no clear difference in nosocomial pneumonia compared with placebo or no prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
ICU mortality · people admitted to intensive care units
Interventions showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality in ICU compared with placebo or no prophylaxis (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Duration of ICU stay · people admitted to intensive care units
1 finding from 1 review
Blood transfusion · people admitted to intensive care units
Interventions probably leads to lower number of participants requiring blood transfusion compared with placebo or no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · people admitted to intensive care units
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Alcohol use prevalence Up to 4 years post intervention impact of family/parent interventions compared to control on the prevalence of alcohol consumption or drunkenness · parents/children
1 finding from 1 review
Alcohol frequency Self report questionnaires Medium‐term · parents/children
1 finding from 1 review
Body‐mass index (BMI) · children aged 6‐12 years
1 finding from 1 review
Body‐mass index z score (zBMI) · children aged 6‐12 years
1 finding from 1 review