Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

199 questions · 221 findings · 20 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 53 · 24%GRADE not reported 11 · 5%Very low 99 · 44.8%Low 49 · 22.2%Moderate 6 · 2.7%High 3 · 1.4%

Summary of findings table ‐ Multimodal interventions vs usual care

Number of nocturnal awakenings · sleep disturbances in dementia

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep disturbances in people with dementia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 404 participants
Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Multimodal interventions vs usual care

Sleep onset latency ‐ not reported · sleep disturbances in dementia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep disturbances in people with dementia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Multimodal interventions vs usual care

Adverse events · sleep disturbances in dementia

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep disturbances in people with dementia 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 589 participants
Low

Light interventions (2/7): Bright light alone at night vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Sleep onset latency, next day; · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 15 participants
Very low

Light interventions (2/7): Bright light alone at night vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Sleep efficiency · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 15 participants
Very low

Light interventions (2/7): Bright light alone at night vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Sleepiness during the night shift, postintervention; · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 14 participants
Very low

Light interventions (2/7): Bright light alone at night vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Total sleep time, next day Diaries and actigraphy. Scale from: 120 to 600. · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 15 participants
Very low

Light interventions (5/7): Bright light alone during day vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Sleepiness during the day shift · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 12 participants
Very low

Light interventions (5/7): Bright light alone during day vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Total sleep time, next night; · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 13 participants
Very low

Light interventions (5/7): Bright light alone during day vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Sleep onset latency, next night; · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 13 participants
Very low

Light interventions (5/7): Bright light alone during day vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Sleep efficiency · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 13 participants
Very low

Light interventions (6/7): Bright light at night plus glasses vs normal light and no glasses

Sleepiness during the night shift, postintervention; · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 17 participants
Very low

Nap interventions (1/2): Nap at night (single nap opportunity) vs no‐nap

Sleepiness during the night shift, postintervention; · Shift workers

5 findings from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 16 participants
Very low
Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 8 participants
Low
Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 49 participants
Low

Show 2 more findings

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 7 participants
Very low
Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 9 participants
Very low

Light interventions (7/7): Bright light plus glasses during day vs normal light and no glasses

Total sleep time, next night; · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 3 participants
Low

Light interventions (7/7): Bright light plus glasses during day vs normal light and no glasses

Sleep onset latency, next night; · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 3 participants
Low

Light interventions (7/7): Bright light plus glasses during day vs normal light and no glasses

Sleep efficiency · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 3 participants
Low

Other interventions (1/1): Physical exercise and sleep hygiene education vs WAIT LIST

Quality of sleep · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 32 participants
Moderate

Pregabalin vs placebo

Self‐reported pain relief ‐ NPSI: ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores are indicative of neuropathic pain. · adults and children with sickle cell disease experiencing neuropathic pain

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating neuropathic pain in people with sickle cell disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 16 participants
Very low

Pregabalin vs placebo

Self‐reported pain relief ‐ S‐LANSS: Possible total scores range from 0 to 24, and a score of 12 or higher is indicative of neuropathic pain. · adults and children with sickle cell disease experiencing neuropathic pain

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating neuropathic pain in people with sickle cell disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 16 participants
Very low

Pregabalin vs placebo

Patient Global Impression of Change · adults and children with sickle cell disease experiencing neuropathic pain

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating neuropathic pain in people with sickle cell disease 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found