What do systematic reviews say?

Any of the interventions (CR, SE, SW, sealing with sealant materials, Hall Technique, or NRCC) vs Each other, placebo, or no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
  None of the studies reported adverse effects.
  0 studies
  No studies found

Any of the interventions (CR, SE, SW, sealing with sealant materials, Hall Technique, or NRCC) vs Each other, placebo, or no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
  We found no studies reporting subjective evaluation of the treatments by participants.
  0 studies
  No studies found

Summary of findings table ‐ Psychosocial interventions intended primarily to reduce antipsychotic use vs (Optimised) usual care

• Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 5 participants
  Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Psychosocial interventions intended primarily to reduce antipsychotic use vs (Optimised) usual care

• Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 3 participants
  High

Summary of findings table ‐ Psychosocial interventions intended primarily to reduce antipsychotic use vs (Optimised) usual care

• Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 7982 participants
  Low

Summary of findings table ‐ Psychosocial interventions intended primarily to reduce antipsychotic use vs (Optimised) usual care

• Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 2 participants
  Moderate

Summary of findings table ‐ Psychosocial interventions intended primarily to reduce antipsychotic use vs (Optimised) usual care

• Psychosocial interventions for reducing antipsychotic medication in care home residents 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 2 participants
  Low

Comparison 2: interventions for patients with multiple episodes of SH or emerging personality problems vs treatment

Comparison 2: interventions for patients with multiple episodes of… showed no clear difference in repetition of SH at post‐intervention compared with treatment (low certainty).

• Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.72 [0.12, 4.4]
  2 studies · 105 participants
  Low

Comparison 2: interventions for patients with multiple episodes of SH or emerging personality problems vs treatment

• Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 104 participants
  Low

Comparison 2: interventions for patients with multiple episodes of SH or emerging personality problems vs treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for self‐harm in children and adolescents 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs usual care

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) may leads to lower service utilisation: Hospital admission ‐ at about 12 months compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

• Family intervention for schizophrenia 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.78 [0.63, 0.98]
  9 studies · 532 participants
  Low

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs usual care

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) may leads to lower global state: Relapse ‐ at about 12 months compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

• Family intervention for schizophrenia 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.55 [0.48, 0.62]
  32 studies · 2981 participants
  Low

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs usual care

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) may leads to lower compliance: Poor compliance with medication compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

• Family intervention for schizophrenia 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.6 [0.49, 0.73]
  10 studies · 695 participants
  Low

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs usual care

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) showed no clear difference in social functioning: Specific ‐ unemployed ‐ at about 1 year compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

• Family intervention for schizophrenia 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.06 [0.89, 1.25]
  5 studies · 285 participants
  Low

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs usual care

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) showed no clear difference in social functioning: Specific ‐ unable to live independently ‐ at… compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

• Family intervention for schizophrenia 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.83 [0.66, 1.03]
  3 studies · 164 participants
  Low

ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether ANY FAMILY BASED INTERVENTIONS (>5 sessions) changes family outcome: Burden ‐ not improved/worse (objective burden… compared with STANDARD CARE (very low certainty).

• Family intervention for schizophrenia 2010 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.53 [0.21, 1.37]
  1 study · 51 participants
  Very low

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful… showed no clear difference in clinical recovery ‐ harmful or hazardous alcohol use (1 to 6 months… compared with enhanced usual care (low certainty).

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.28 [0.94, 1.74]
  4 studies · 872 participants
  Low

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful… showed no clear difference in prevalence of methamphetamine use (1 to 6 months post intervention)… compared with enhanced usual care (low certainty).

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.01 [0.91, 1.13]
  1 study · 882 participants
  Low

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 667 participants
  Moderate

Lay health worker‐led interventions for adult patients with harmful or hazardous alcohol or substance use vs enhanced usual care

• Primary‐level worker interventions for the care of people living with mental disorders and distress in low‐ and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 540 participants
  Moderate