What do systematic reviews say?

Exercise vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 875 participants
  Low

Exercise vs usual care with or without sham interventions

Summary of findings table ‐ Exercise interventions showed no clear difference in falls during hospitalisation compared with usual care with or without sham interventions (moderate certainty).

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.99 [0.59, 1.65]
  9 studies · 1787 participants
  Moderate

Exercise vs usual care with or without sham interventions

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Exercise interventions changes medical deterioration during hospitalisation compared with usual care with or without sham interventions (very low certainty).

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.02 [0.62, 1.68]
  11 studies · 2730 participants
  Very low

Exercise vs usual care with or without sham interventions

• Exercise for acutely hospitalised older medical patients 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Information or education intervention as part of a complex intervention vs complex intervention without information or education

• Information or education interventions for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their carers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 175 participants
  Very low

Information or education intervention as part of a complex intervention vs complex intervention without information or education

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Information or education interventions for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their carers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Information or education intervention as part of a complex intervention vs complex intervention without information or education

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Information or education interventions for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their carers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Information or education intervention as part of a complex intervention vs complex intervention without information or education

• Information or education interventions for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their carers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 59 participants
  Very low

Information or education intervention as part of a complex intervention vs complex intervention without information or education

• Information or education interventions for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their carers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 38 participants
  Very low

Information or education intervention as part of a complex intervention vs complex intervention without information or education

• Information or education interventions for adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their carers 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 38 participants
  Very low

Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo

Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal… showed no clear difference in number of participants with moderate/severe acute exacerbations… compared with nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo (low certainty).

• Pharmacological and surgical interventions for the treatment of gastro‐oesophageal reflux in adults and children with… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.53 [0.17, 1.63]
  2 studies · 1168 participants
  Low

Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo

• Pharmacological and surgical interventions for the treatment of gastro‐oesophageal reflux in adults and children with… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  7 studies · 1333 participants
  Moderate

Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo

• Pharmacological and surgical interventions for the treatment of gastro‐oesophageal reflux in adults and children with… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 239 participants
  Moderate

Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo

• Pharmacological and surgical interventions for the treatment of gastro‐oesophageal reflux in adults and children with… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  5 studies · 1595 participants
  Low

Medical or surgical intervention, or both, for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease vs nil intervention, delayed intervention control, or placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Pharmacological and surgical interventions for the treatment of gastro‐oesophageal reflux in adults and children with… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions vs usual care

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions leads to higher favourable functional outcome at the end of compared with standard therapy (high certainty).

• Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.5 [1.37, 1.63]
  18 studies · 3715 participants
  High

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions vs usual care

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions leads to lower death from all causes at the end of compared with standard therapy (high certainty).

• Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.85 [0.75, 0.97]
  19 studies · 3793 participants
  High

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions vs usual care

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at the end of compared with standard therapy (high certainty).

• Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.05 [0.72, 1.52]
  10 studies · 1752 participants
  High

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions vs usual care

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions probably leads to higher neurological status at the end of compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

• Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 2.03 [1.21, 3.4]
  3 studies · 334 participants
  Moderate

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions vs usual care

Endovascular thrombectomy interventions probably leads to higher degree of recanalisation (TIMI grade) compared with standard therapy (moderate certainty).

• Endovascular thrombectomy and intra‐arterial interventions for acute ischaemic stroke 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 8.25 [1.63, 41.9]
  2 studies · 198 participants
  Moderate