evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,183 questions · 2,385 findings · 241 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 558 · 23.4%GRADE not reported 158 · 6.6%Very low 704 · 29.5%Low 618 · 25.9%Moderate 276 · 11.6%High 71 · 3%

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs control

Visual acuity · people with traumatic hyphema

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in short‐term visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/60 at end of… compared with control (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs control

Final visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/50; monocular vs binocular eye patching · people with traumatic hyphema

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in final visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/50; monocular vs binocular… compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs control

Risk of secondary hemorrhage; monocular versus binocular eye patching · people with traumatic hyphema

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in risk of secondary hemorrhage; monocular vs binocular eye patching compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions vs control

Risk of secondary hemorrhage; ambulatory treatment versus bed rest · people with traumatic hyphema

Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in risk of secondary hemorrhage; ambulatory treatment vs bed rest compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs usual care or attention control

Falls · Older people living in the community

Multiple component interventions probably leads to lower rate of falls (falls per person years) compared with usual care or attention control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs usual care or attention control

Number of people who experienced one or more falls · Older people living in the community

Multiple component interventions probably leads to lower number of people sustaining one or more falls compared with usual care or attention control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs usual care or attention control

Number of people sustaining recurrent falls (defined as two or more falls in a specified time period) · Older people living in the community

Multiple component interventions showed no clear difference in number of people sustaining recurrent falls (defined as two or more… compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs usual care or attention control

Number of people sustaining one or more fall‐related fractures · Older people living in the community

It is very uncertain whether multiple component interventions changes number of people sustaining one or more fall‐related fractures compared with usual care or attention control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs usual care or attention control

Number of people who experience a fall that required hospital admission · Older people living in the community

It is very uncertain whether multiple component interventions changes number of people who experience a fall that required hospital… compared with usual care or attention control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Multi‐component intervention vs usual care or attention control

Number of people who experience a fall that required medical attention · Older people living in the community

Multiple component interventions showed no clear difference in number of people who experience a fall that required medical attention compared with usual care or attention control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review