Functional outcomes · Children and adolescents with femoral shaft fractures
1 finding from 1 review
Unacceptable malunion · Children and adolescents with femoral shaft fractures
Surgical interventions probably leads to lower unacceptable malunion Assessed by imaging compared with conservative interventions (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · Children and adolescents with femoral shaft fractures
Surgical interventions may leads to higher serious adverse events compared with conservative interventions (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to return to usual activities⁶(time to return to school) · Children and adolescents with femoral shaft fractures
1 finding from 1 review
Child satisfaction Assessed by an ordinal rating scale (11 points): very unhappy to very happy · Children and adolescents with femoral shaft fractures
1 finding from 1 review
Parent satisfaction Rated as excellent or good · Children and adolescents with femoral shaft fractures
Surgical interventions may leads to higher parent satisfaction Rated as excellent or good compared with conservative interventions (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Resource use and other costs · Children and adolescents with femoral shaft fractures
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Alcohol use prevalence Up to 4 years post intervention impact of family/parent interventions compared to control on the prevalence of alcohol consumption or drunkenness · parents/children
1 finding from 1 review
Alcohol frequency Self report questionnaires Medium‐term · parents/children
1 finding from 1 review
Alcohol use volume Up to 4 years post intervention impact of family/parent interventions compared to control on the volume of alcohol consumption or drunkenness · parents/children
1 finding from 1 review
Diagnosis of depression · Children or adolescents
Evidence‐based psychological interventions probably leads to lower evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator… compared with any comparator (moderate certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
RR 0.84 [0.72, 0.97]
Studies not reported
Moderate
RR 0.82 [0.68, 0.99]
Studies not reported
Very low
RR 0.87 [0.66, 1.14]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator (Overall) ‐ self‐rated depression scores (higher score is equivalent to a poorer outcome) · Children or adolescents
1 finding from 1 review
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator (Targeted ‐ self‐rated depression scores (higher score is equivalent to a poorer outcome)) · Children or adolescents
1 finding from 1 review
Evidence‐based psychological interventions versus any comparator (Universal programmes) ‐ self‐rated depression scores (higher score is equivalent to a poorer outcome) · Children or adolescents
1 finding from 1 review
Recurrence of postnatal psychosis · Women at risk of postnatal psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
Suicide · Women at risk of postnatal psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
Infanticide · Women at risk of postnatal psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
Hospital admissions · Women at risk of postnatal psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects/events · Women at risk of postnatal psychosis
1 finding from 1 review
A Labelling interventions
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found