Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

536 questions · 579 findings · 94 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 151 · 26.1%GRADE not reported 52 · 9%Very low 182 · 31.4%Low 120 · 20.7%Moderate 52 · 9%High 22 · 3.8%

Any intervention to manage relapse: fixed options (labial braces, lingual braces, fixed lingual wire) or removable options (Hawley's retainer with spring elastomeric module, Bloore removable aligner, other Hawley's retainer modifications, Invisalign, Clearstep) vs no intervention or another intervention

Aesthetics · Participants who previously underwent orthodontic treatment, with subsequent crowding (relapse) of the lower front teeth (lower incisors…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for managing relapse of the lower front teeth after orthodontic treatment 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
No RCTs met the inclusion criteria for this review. After deduplication, the electronic searching identified 527 publications; after reviewing the titles and abstracts, none focused on interventions to correct the…
0 studies
No studies found

Comparison 6: Remote contact interventions vs treatment

Telephone contact vs TAU · adults who engage in SH

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Psychosocial interventions for self‐harm in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

Incidence of delirium

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention probably leads to lower incidence of delirium validated instruments1 compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.69 [0.59, 0.81]
7 studies · 1950 participants
Moderate

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

Duration of delirium Days

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 244 participants
Very low

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

Severity of delirium

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 67 participants
Low

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

Length of hospital stay

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 1920 participants
Moderate

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

Return to independent living

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention showed no clear difference in return to independent living compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.85, 1.06]
4 studies · 1116 participants
Moderate

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

Inpatient mortality

It is very uncertain whether A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention changes inpatient mortality compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.9 [0.56, 1.43]
3 studies · 859 participants
Very low

Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone

Parental stress · children with Down syndrome aged between birth and six years

1 finding from 1 review

Parent‐mediated interventions for promoting communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Very low

Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone

Changes in parental behaviour/responsivity · children with Down syndrome aged between birth and six years

1 finding from 1 review

Parent‐mediated interventions for promoting communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Very low

Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone

Socialisation · children with Down syndrome aged between birth and six years

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Parent‐mediated interventions for promoting communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone

Language attrition · children with Down syndrome aged between birth and six years

1 finding from 1 review

Parent‐mediated interventions for promoting communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Very low

Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone

Adherence · children with Down syndrome aged between birth and six years

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Parent‐mediated interventions for promoting communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone

Expressive language (number of words; standard scores; MLUw; NDW; IPSyn; frequency of unique targets; % target talk) · children with Down syndrome aged between birth and six years

1 finding from 1 review

Parent‐mediated interventions for promoting communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Very low

Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone

Receptive language (total language; standard scores) · children with Down syndrome aged between birth and six years

1 finding from 1 review

Parent‐mediated interventions for promoting communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 18 participants
Very low

Light interventions (2/7): Bright light alone at night vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Sleep onset latency, next day; · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 15 participants
Very low

Light interventions (2/7): Bright light alone at night vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Sleep efficiency · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 15 participants
Very low

Light interventions (2/7): Bright light alone at night vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Sleepiness during the night shift, postintervention; · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 14 participants
Very low

Light interventions (2/7): Bright light alone at night vs normal light (300 lux) plus placebo capsule

Total sleep time, next day Diaries and actigraphy. Scale from: 120 to 600. · Shift workers

1 finding from 1 review

Person‐directed, non‐pharmacological interventions for sleepiness at work and sleep disturbances caused by shift work 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 15 participants
Very low

Multi‐component intervention with consumers and providers working in partnership vs the same intervention without partnership

Health service user (trial participant) health service performance ratings (local accountability) · consumer and provider partnership participants or trial participants

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low