Cochrane · systematic review · CD012089

Parent‐mediated interventions for promoting communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome

O'Toole, C, Lee, ASY, Gibbon, FE, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 21.4%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 11 · 78.6%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Parent‐mediated intervention versus treatment as usual for communication and language development in young children with Down syndrome

Population: children with Down syndrome aged between birth and six years
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Expressive language (number of (different) target words)
Parent‐mediated intervention vs treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 12 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Receptive language (total language; standard scores)
Parent‐mediated intervention vs treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Parental stress
Parent‐mediated intervention vs treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Changes in parental behaviour/responsivity
Parent‐mediated intervention vs treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 27 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Socialisation
Parent‐mediated intervention vs treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Language attrition
Parent‐mediated intervention vs treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 27 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adherence to treatment
Parent‐mediated intervention vs treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 12 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency

Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention versus clinician‐mediated intervention alone for language development in young children with Down syndrome

Population: children with Down syndrome aged between birth and six years
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Expressive language (number of words; standard scores; MLUw; NDW; IPSyn; frequency of unique targets; % target talk)
Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Receptive language (total language; standard scores)
Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Parental stress (total stress scores)
Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Changes in parental behaviour/responsivity
Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Socialisation
Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Language attrition
Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Adherence to treatment
Parent‐ and clinician‐mediated intervention vs clinician‐mediated intervention alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies