Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 66.7%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Interrupted vs uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy

Thromboembolic events · adults with arrhythmias undergoing catheter ablation

It is very uncertain whether interrupted changes thromboembolic events compared with uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.76 [0.33, 9.46]
6 studies · 3468 participants
Very low

Interrupted vs uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy

Asymptomatic thromboembolic events · adults with arrhythmias undergoing catheter ablation

It is very uncertain whether interrupted changes asymptomatic thromboembolic events compared with uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.45 [0.85, 2.47]
6 studies · 1268 participants
Very low

Interrupted vs uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy

Composite endpoint of thromboembolic events (stroke or systemic embolism), major bleeding events, and all‐cause mortality · adults with arrhythmias undergoing catheter ablation

Interrupted may leads to lower composite endpoint of thromboembolic events (stroke or systemic… compared with uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interrupted versus uninterrupted anticoagulation therapy for catheter ablation in adults with arrhythmias 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.23 [0.07, 0.81]
1 study · 442 participants
Low