Fatal and non‐fatal injuries in RCT, short‐term · firms potentially subject to inspection
Inspection showed no clear difference in fatal and non‐fatal injuries in RCT, short‐term compared with no intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.04 [0.9, 1.21]
Studies not reported
Low
Fatal and non‐fatal injuries in CBA, long‐term · firms potentially subject to inspection
Inspection showed no clear difference in fatal and non‐fatal injuries in CBA, medium‐term compared with no intervention (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
RR 0.87 [0.75, 1.02]
Studies not reported
Low
RR 0.77 [0.64, 0.92]
Studies not reported
Low
Fatal and non‐fatal crashes, ITS‐level Crash data · firms potentially subject to inspection
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Fatal and non‐fatal crashes, ITS‐slope Crash data · firms potentially subject to inspection
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Compliance with COHSASA accreditation standards
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Compliance with COHSASA accreditation standards ‐ subgroup of critical criteria analysed
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Indicators for hospital quality of care
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low
Mortality and condition‐specific measures of outcome related to patients' health
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse consequences
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Costs and cost‐effectiveness
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Specificity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD · Apparently healthy adults not reporting symptoms of OPMD or OSCC, attending an organised screening or surveillance programme, or screened…
1 finding from 1 review
Summary of findings 1 (no pooled analysis): for the 7 low-prevalence studies specificity ranged from 0.94 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.97) to 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.00); for the 3 higher-prevalence studies specificity ranged from…
10 studies · 25568 participants
Low
Sensitivity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD · Apparently healthy adults not reporting symptoms of OPMD or OSCC, attending an organised screening or surveillance programme, or screened…
1 finding from 1 review
Summary of findings 1 (no pooled analysis): for the 7 studies with low prevalence (<=10%) sensitivity ranged from 0.50 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.93) to 0.99 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.00); for the 3 higher-prevalence studies…
10 studies · 25568 participants
Low
Oral cancer mortality (disease-specific) · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…
Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers showed no clear difference in oral cancer mortality (disease-specific) compared with no screening (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Costs · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…
1 finding from 1 review
Harms of screening (false-positive/false-negative outcomes) · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
No harms were reported.
0 studies
No studies found
Oral cancer incidence · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…
Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers showed no clear difference in oral cancer incidence compared with no screening; GRADE not reported.
2 findings from 1 review
Stage at diagnosis (early-stage detection) · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…
Visual screening (oral visual inspection) by trained health workers led to lower stage at diagnosis (early-stage detection) compared with no screening; GRADE not reported.
2 findings from 1 review
Quality of life · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Test performance (sensitivity and specificity) · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…
1 finding from 1 review
Survival (proportion alive after diagnosis) · Apparently healthy adults aged 35 years or older (general population), living in 13 clusters in rural areas of Trivandrum city, Kerala,…
1 finding from 1 review