Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 33.3%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 66.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Abundant water intake vs standard water intake

Stone recurrence (assessed as symptomatic renal colic/stone expulsion episodes and imaging) · participants with a prior history of nephrolithiasis

Increased water intake may leads to lower stone recurrence (assessed as symptomatic renal colic/stone… compared with standard water intake (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Water for preventing urinary stones 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.45 [0.24, 0.84]
1 study · 199 participants
Low

Abundant water intake vs standard water intake

Time to recurrence · participants with a prior history of nephrolithiasis

Increased water intake may leads to lower time to recurrence (absolute event rate based on 5‐year compared with standard water intake (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Water for preventing urinary stones 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
HR 0.4 [0.2, 0.79]
1 study · 199 participants
Low

Abundant water intake vs standard water intake

Adverse events · participants with a prior history of nephrolithiasis

1 finding from 1 review

Water for preventing urinary stones 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 studies · 0 participants
GRADE not reported