Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

143 questions · 145 findings · 16 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 15 · 10.3%GRADE not reported 36 · 24.8%Very low 35 · 24.1%Low 31 · 21.4%Moderate 19 · 13.1%High 9 · 6.2%

Needle aspiration (needle removed immediately after aspiration) vs intercostal tube drainage

Bleeding from incision for the insertion of the needle or the tube ‐ not reported · patients with pneumothorax in the newborn

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Needle aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for pneumothorax in the newborn 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Needle aspiration (needle removed immediately after aspiration) vs intercostal tube drainage

Haemothorax ‐ not reported · patients with pneumothorax in the newborn

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Needle aspiration versus intercostal tube drainage for pneumothorax in the newborn 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Partial pulpotomy with immediate (same-visit) permanent restoration vs Partial pulpotomy with delayed permanent restoration (7-14 days or >14 days)

Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Adults (>=18 y) with mature permanent teeth and deep carious pulp exposure

Immediate permanent restoration after partial pulpotomy is associated with much higher success than delayed restoration (89.9% immediate vs 23.2% beyond 14 days; ungraded).

1 finding from 1 review

Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2025 All outcomes
>=1 year · Dental/endodontic clinical practice · Timing of permanent restoration: immediate vs >14 days
MD 66.7
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported