Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

Ignored "IF": search terms need at least 3 characters.

1,793 questions · 1,866 findings · 339 reviews

No studies found 245 · 13.1%GRADE not reported 142 · 7.6%Very low 612 · 32.8%Low 513 · 27.5%Moderate 305 · 16.3%High 49 · 2.6%

Back School vs short‐wave diathermy at the lowest intensity

Duration of sick‐leave Sick‐leave > 21 days · participants with acute or subacute low‐back pain

It is very uncertain whether back school changes duration of sick‐leave Sick‐leave > 21 days compared with short‐wave diathermy at the lowest intensity (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Longer intervals (5‐15 days) (intervention) vs shorter intervals (2‐5 days) (control) between dressing changes

Catheter‐related blood stream infection · patients with a central venous catheter

Longer intervals (5‐15 days) (intervention) showed no clear difference in catheter‐related blood stream infection (CRBSI) compared with shorter intervals (2‐5 days) (control) between dressing changes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Longer intervals (5‐15 days) (intervention) vs shorter intervals (2‐5 days) (control) between dressing changes

All‐cause mortality · patients with a central venous catheter

Longer intervals (5‐15 days) (intervention) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with shorter intervals (2‐5 days) (control) between dressing changes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Longer intervals (5‐15 days) (intervention) vs shorter intervals (2‐5 days) (control) between dressing changes

Pain № of participants: 193 (2 RCTs) · patients with a central venous catheter

Longer intervals (5‐15 days) (intervention) showed no clear difference in pain № of participants: 193 (2 RCTs) compared with shorter intervals (2‐5 days) (control) between dressing changes (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Virtual reality vs active intervention (short term)

Gait assessment · rehabilitation in Parkinson's disease
3 findings from 1 review