Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Emergency and Critical Care

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 14.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 85.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

High‐frequency oscillation vs conventional ventilation

Outcomes** · people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

High‐frequency oscillation vs conventional ventilation

Mortality (at 30 days or until hospital discharge) · people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

It is very uncertain whether high‐frequency oscillation changes mortality (at 30 days or until hospital discharge) compared with conventional ventilation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.92 [0.72, 1.16]
8 studies · 1779 participants
Very low

High‐frequency oscillation vs conventional ventilation

Mortality (at 6 months) · people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

It is very uncertain whether high‐frequency oscillation changes mortality (at 6 months) compared with conventional ventilation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.79 [0.58, 1.08]
1 study · 148 participants
Very low

High‐frequency oscillation vs conventional ventilation

Treatment failure · people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

It is very uncertain whether high‐frequency oscillation changes treatment failure compared with conventional ventilation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.64 [0.48, 0.85]
6 studies · 956 participants
Very low

High‐frequency oscillation vs conventional ventilation

Duration of mechanical ventilation · people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1 finding from 1 review

High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 1142 participants
Very low

High‐frequency oscillation vs conventional ventilation

Barotrauma · people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

It is very uncertain whether high‐frequency oscillation changes barotrauma compared with conventional ventilation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.82 [0.51, 1.32]
7 studies · 951 participants
Very low

High‐frequency oscillation vs conventional ventilation

Hypotension · people with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

It is very uncertain whether high‐frequency oscillation changes hypotension compared with conventional ventilation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.02 [0.54, 1.9]
4 studies · 392 participants
Very low