evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

5 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Stroke

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 3 · 42.9%High 1 · 14.3%

Endovascular coiling vs neurosurgical clipping

Death or dependence · people with subarachnoid haemorrhage from a ruptured intracranial aneurysm

Endovascular coiling probably leads to lower poor outcome: death or dependence in daily activities (12 months) compared with neurosurgical clipping (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Endovascular coiling vs neurosurgical clipping

Death from any cause (12 months) · people with subarachnoid haemorrhage from a ruptured intracranial aneurysm

Endovascular coiling showed no clear difference in death from any cause (12 months) compared with neurosurgical clipping (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular coiling vs neurosurgical clipping

Delayed cerebral ischaemia · people with subarachnoid haemorrhage from a ruptured intracranial aneurysm

Endovascular coiling probably leads to lower delayed cerebral ischaemia (2–3 months) compared with neurosurgical clipping (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Endovascular coiling vs neurosurgical clipping

Rebleeding · people with subarachnoid haemorrhage from a ruptured intracranial aneurysm

Endovascular coiling leads to higher rebleeding postprocedure up to 1 year compared with neurosurgical clipping (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Endovascular coiling vs neurosurgical clipping

Complications from the intervention · people with subarachnoid haemorrhage from a ruptured intracranial aneurysm

Endovascular coiling showed no clear difference in complications from the intervention compared with neurosurgical clipping (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review