Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Work

No studies found 1 · 14.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 85.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Blood lead levels (high baseline levels) (µg/dL at medium‐term · workers and foremen

2 findings from 1 review

Educational interventions for preventing lead poisoning in workers 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
18 participants
Very low
Educational interventions for preventing lead poisoning in workers 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
34 participants
Very low

Blood lead levels (high baseline levels) (µg/dL at long‐term · workers and foremen

1 finding from 1 review

Educational interventions for preventing lead poisoning in workers 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
69 participants
Very low

Blood lead levels (low baseline levels) (µg/dL at long‐term · workers and foremen

1 finding from 1 review

Educational interventions for preventing lead poisoning in workers 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
52 participants
Very low

Urine lead levels (high baseline levels) (µg/L at short‐term · workers and foremen

1 finding from 1 review

Educational interventions for preventing lead poisoning in workers 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
35 participants
Very low

Zinc protoporphyrin levels in blood · workers and foremen

1 finding from 1 review

Educational interventions for preventing lead poisoning in workers 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
51 participants
Very low

Aminolevulinic acid levels in urine · workers and foremen

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Educational interventions for preventing lead poisoning in workers 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found