Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 4 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side (same patient)

Development and eruption of the second permanent molar · Children aged 5 to 15 years with a compromised first permanent molar

Root closure and eruption of the second permanent molar appeared accelerated on the extraction side in a single case-control study; ungraded and not statistically tested.

1 finding from 1 review

Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review. 2018 All outcomes
Orthodontic clinic (Turkey)
Root closure and eruption of the second permanent molar were accelerated on the extraction side versus the non-extraction side (Telli and Aytan; not statistically tested). Table 3: Category III, Class C.
1 study
GRADE not reported

Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar vs Teeth in the same arch/patient with the first permanent molar present

Caries and/or fillings in adjacent teeth · Children aged 5 to 15 years with a compromised first permanent molar

One study found fewer decayed or filled proximal surfaces but more decayed or filled occlusal surfaces in arches with an extracted first permanent molar; ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review. 2018 All outcomes
School-based survey (South Glamorgan, UK) · Proximal surfaces (extraction vs FPM present; fewer decayed/filled with extraction)
OR 0.48 [0.33, 0.69]
1 study
GRADE not reported

Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar vs Non-extraction (retained first permanent molar) or contralateral non-extraction side

Spontaneous space closure · Children aged 5 to 15 years with a compromised first permanent molar

Early extraction of a compromised first permanent molar is followed by variable spontaneous closure of the post-extraction space (about 45.5% to 85.2% of cases); certainty was not GRADE-rated (Shekelle category III).

1 finding from 1 review

Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review. 2018 All outcomes
Hospital- and clinic-based pediatric dental settings (Sweden, Romania, UK, Palestine, Turkey)
Spontaneous space closure ranged from 45.5% to 85.2% overall (maxilla 33.3% to 94%, mandible 50% to 75%). Table 3 conclusion: early extraction of compromised FPM leads to decrease in post extraction space (Category III…
6 studies
GRADE not reported

Early extraction of a compromised mandibular first permanent molar vs Contralateral non-extraction side (same patient)

Development and eruption of the third molar · Children aged 5 to 15 years with a compromised first permanent molar

Development and eruption of the third molar appeared accelerated after early first permanent molar extraction in two studies (e.g., eruption OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.96); ungraded.

1 finding from 1 review

Consequences of early extraction of compromised first permanent molar: a systematic review. 2018 All outcomes
Hospital-based oral surgery and orthodontic departments (Turkey)
OR 2.86 [1.37, 5.96]
2 studies
GRADE not reported