evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months

Target lesion revascularization · patients with in‐stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries

It is very uncertain whether drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months changes target lesion revascularization (TLR) compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months

Binary restenosis · patients with in‐stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries

It is very uncertain whether drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months changes binary restenosis compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months

Death · patients with in‐stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries

It is very uncertain whether drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months changes death compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months vs uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months

Improvement ≥ 1 Rutherford category · patients with in‐stent restenosis of the femoropopliteal arteries

It is very uncertain whether drug‐eluting balloon angioplasty at 6 months changes improvement ≥ 1 Rutherford category compared with uncoated balloon angioplasty at 6 months (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review