What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 8 findings · 1 reviews · Oral Health

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 8 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Digital bitewing radiography, sensor-based (CCD/CMOS) vs Histological validation of dental tissues (gold standard)

Diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries detection (dentin detection level) · Extracted permanent posterior teeth with proximal surfaces (in vitro)

Under in vitro conditions, sensor-based digital bitewing radiography had a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 12.84 (95% CI 6.56, 25.13) for proximal caries detection at the dentin detection level; ungraded.

4 findings from 1 review

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
DOR 12.84 [6.56, 25.13]
4 studies
GRADE not reported
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
Specificity 0.95 [0.93, 0.97]
4 studies
GRADE not reported
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
AUC 0.90
4 studies
GRADE not reported

Show 1 more finding

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
Sensitivity 0.36 [0.30, 0.42]
4 studies
GRADE not reported

Digital bitewing radiography, sensor-based (CCD/CMOS) vs Direct visual examination after tooth separation or bioptical cavity preparation

Diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries detection (dentin detection level) · Patients with permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces assessed clinically (in vivo)

Under in vivo conditions, sensor-based digital bitewing radiography had a pooled sensitivity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.91, 0.98) for proximal caries detection at the dentin detection level; ungraded.

4 findings from 1 review

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vivo (clinical); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
Sensitivity 0.96 [0.91, 0.98]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vivo (clinical); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
Specificity 0.50 [0.02, 0.98]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vivo (clinical); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
AUC 0.89
1 study
GRADE not reported

Show 1 more finding

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vivo (clinical); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
DOR 24.4 [0.44, 1359.98]
1 study
GRADE not reported