What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 8 findings · 1 reviews · Oral Health

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 8 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Conventional bitewing radiography, F-speed film vs Histological validation of dental tissues (gold standard)

Diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries detection (dentin detection level) · Extracted permanent posterior teeth with proximal surfaces (in vitro)

Under in vitro conditions, conventional F-speed bitewing radiography had a pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 8.7 (95% CI 4.2, 18.1) for proximal caries detection at the dentin detection level; ungraded.

4 findings from 1 review

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
DOR 8.7 [4.2, 18.1]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
Sensitivity 0.42 [0.29, 0.56]
3 studies
GRADE not reported
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
AUC 0.81
3 studies
GRADE not reported

Show 1 more finding

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · Dentin detection level
Specificity 0.92 [0.86, 0.96]
3 studies
GRADE not reported

Conventional bitewing radiography, F-speed film vs Histological validation of dental tissues (gold standard)

Diagnostic accuracy for proximal caries detection (1/3 dentin detection level) · Extracted permanent posterior teeth with proximal surfaces (in vitro)

Under in vitro conditions, conventional F-speed bitewing radiography had a summary ROC AUC of 0.98 for proximal caries detection at the 1/3 dentin detection level; ungraded.

4 findings from 1 review

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · 1/3 dentin detection level
AUC 0.98
1 study
GRADE not reported
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · 1/3 dentin detection level
Sensitivity 0.54 [0.36, 0.70]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · 1/3 dentin detection level
Specificity 0.996 [0.96, 1]
1 study
GRADE not reported

Show 1 more finding

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies of proximal surface caries. 2021 All outcomes
In vitro (laboratory; extracted teeth); permanent posterior teeth, proximal surfaces · 1/3 dentin detection level
DOR 283.6 [16.1, 5010.0]
1 study
GRADE not reported