Continuous veno‐venous hemofiltration (CVVH) vs no CVVH
- Continuous veno‐venous hemofiltration for severe acute pancreatitis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only0.62 [0.27, 1.4]2 studies · 189 participantsVery low
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether continuous veno‐venous hemofiltration (CVVH) changes length of ICU stay compared with no CVVH (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether continuous veno‐venous hemofiltration (CVVH) changes length of hospital stay compared with no CVVH (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether continuous veno‐venous hemofiltration (CVVH) changes total hospital cost compared with no CVVH (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
High‐volume continuous veno‐venous hemofiltration (CVVH) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with standard CVVH (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether high‐volume continuous veno‐venous hemofiltration (CVVH) changes adverse events compared with standard CVVH (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.