Primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) vs no CPM
- Continuous passive motion following total knee arthroplasty in people with arthritis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted8 studies · 414 participantsLow
It is very uncertain whether primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) changes manipulation under anaesthesia Counts of manipulation under… compared with no CPM (very low certainty).
Primary comparison for continuous passive motion (CPM) showed no clear difference in adverse events Counts of adverse events compared with no CPM (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether continuous negative extrathoracic pressure ventilation changes less than 30% FiO2 after 1 hour of therapy compared with control (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether continuous negative extrathoracic pressure ventilation changes intermittent positive pressure ventilation during hospital stay compared with control (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether continuous negative extrathoracic pressure ventilation changes CPAP during hospital stay compared with control (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
High‐volume continuous veno‐venous hemofiltration (CVVH) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with standard CVVH (low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether high‐volume continuous veno‐venous hemofiltration (CVVH) changes adverse events compared with standard CVVH (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Continuous glucose monitoring may leads to lower hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (including pre‐eclampsia,… compared with intermittent glucose monitoring (low certainty).
Continuous glucose monitoring showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with intermittent glucose monitoring (moderate certainty).
Continuous glucose monitoring showed no clear difference in large‐for‐gestational age compared with intermittent glucose monitoring (low certainty).
Continuous glucose monitoring showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality (stillbirth and neonatal mortality) compared with intermittent glucose monitoring (low certainty).