Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1 questions · 1 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 100%High 0 · 0%

Chlorhexidine gluconate‐impregnated (CGI) dressing vs SPU dressings

Catheter tip colonisation · patients with CVCs

Chlorhexidine gluconate‐impregnated (CGI) dressing probably leads to lower catheter tip colonisation: compared with SPU dressings (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Dressings and securement devices for central venous catheters (CVC) 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.58 [0.47, 0.73]
6 studies · 4431 participants
Moderate